When it comes to the Bible, can we sometimes make assumptions, that can then turn out to be possibly a bit suspect, or even wrong?
I’m thinking that I have made assumptions about the miracle, when Jesus turned the water into wine. I made the assumption that the water in the ceremonial jars, turned into wine, whilst it was in the jars.
But I’ve come to realise that, that particular detail, actually, isn’t in scripture. Shall we have a read of the scripture in question.
John 2:1-11
Jesus Changes Water Into Wine
2 On the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there, 2 and Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine was gone, Jesus’ mother said to him, “They have no more wine.”
4 “Woman, why do you involve me?” Jesus replied. “My hour has not yet come.”
5 His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.”
6 Nearby stood six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to thirty gallons.
7 Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water”; so they filled them to the brim.
8 Then he told them, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet.”
They did so, 9 and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the bridegroom aside 10 and said, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have saved the best till now.”
11 What Jesus did here in Cana of Galilee was the first of the signs through which he revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.
___________________________
If we pay close attention to verse 9, we read that “and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine.”
This verse states that the master of the banquet was given the water that had been turned into wine, but it doesn’t say what happened to the water that was in the stone jars, just that it was wine, when it was poured out to the master of the banquet.
Which leads to my question for this post. When did the water, actually turn into wine?
Did the water turn into wine, whilst it was in the stone jars, as I used to think? (Assumed, but I’m now questioning?)
Or was it a continuous miracle, of the water being transformed as it was being taken and served, to the guests, in the serving jugs?
Could it have been a case of, the servants were drawing water, from the stone jars, and seeing and knowing that it really was water that they were drawing from the stone jars. As they had been told to do so, by Jesus.
To then go and serve up wine, as they served it to the guests?
(Incidentally, the serving jugs and wine goblets were probably not glass, as they are today, but something of a less transparent nature.)
If it was a continuous transformation, could you imagine the conversations that could have happened amongst the servants?
“This doesn’t make sense. I draw out water, but I serve up wine??”
“I do hope that this keeps on working??”
“This is amazing, I can’t wait to get back to draw out some more water, to then serve up… Wine… !! … ??” Could be a few of the possibilities.
If it was a continuous transformation, then the servants would be in a place of needing to keep trusting, that it would keep working. Would it have got easier as the night carried on?
Would past experience settle their nerves, as they could think, “It worked the last number of times, it should be good, this time, as well.” ?
Do we remember when we have seen God do a work in our lives, and do we remember it, when we have a need to trust God, again?
I’m questioning as to whether Mary had previous experience of Jesus meeting a need, in their past, when their was a shortfall, and this previous experience, gave Mary the confidence, to bring the matter to Jesus in the first instance???
As I was pondering on this change of thinking, I did a search for the closest translation for the original words that are recorded.
My search led me to the word that it is recorded that was spoken by Jesus for, “to draw”. The word for drawing out the water, appeared to have a connection to bailing out water from the bottom of a boat.
It also appeared to be the same or a similar word, that was used when Jesus asked for water from the Samaritan woman, at the well.
Someone who knows how to look deeper into these details, maybe able to confirm, or even question these thoughts, better than me. But, if I’m correct, then it appears that Jesus is telling the servants, to draw out water.
This, hints to me, that the water in the jars, remained as water, in the jars, and was transformed, as it was taken to the guests, in the form of a continuous miracle. ???
I shared these thoughts with some fellow brothers, and one replied that it sounded similar to when Jesus fed the thousands. In those accounts, Jesus continued to break the loaves and fishes, as He gave them to His disciples. I’m also remembering that there is the account of the leppers, who were healed, as they went.
I’m going to finish up here by stating that I don’t know for certain, how it happened, as those details are a bit thin on the ground. But I am thinking that it could have been different, to what I’d previously thought it was.
So, it’s over to you.
What do you think actually happened?
When do you think, the water, actually turned into wine?